Home Crypto news Ripple’s 1991 trademark trail, domain clues, US intelligence links spark intrigue
Crypto news

Ripple’s 1991 trademark trail, domain clues, US intelligence links spark intrigue

Share
Share

A web of domain registrations, telecom records, and defence-linked affiliations is drawing fresh attention to Ripple’s early history.

While Ripple Labs is widely known as the blockchain firm behind XRP, a resurfaced theory by Edward Farina, founder of Alpha Lions Academy, suggests the company’s roots may stretch back further than most believe.

With connections to a now-defunct telecom firm, curious domain name registrations, and links to individuals associated with US intelligence circles, Farina argues Ripple’s public story may only be part of the picture.

Domain history and rebranding raise questions

The timeline presented by Farina begins with a trademarked company called Ripple Communications, established in 1991—years before cryptocurrency was even conceived.

He claims this name was not a coincidence, despite Ripple’s original creator Ryan Fugger attributing the name “Ripple” to a song by the Grateful Dead.

In 2005, several key domains were registered under the same IP address: Ripplecom, RipplePay, and OpenCoin. The last of these, OpenCoin, would later become Ripple Labs.

That same year also saw the reorganisation of the US-based Intelligence and National Security Alliance (INSA), which connects private contractors to US spy agencies.

Ripple Communications appears to have quietly disappeared just as Ripple Labs began to gain prominence.

However, Farina points out that the original telecom trademark was quietly acquired by Ripple Labs after the domain name ripple.com was purchased by Jed McCaleb.

This happened shortly after Suzanne Wilson Heckenberg, who had served in senior roles at INSA, ended her stint at Ripple Communications between 2010 and 2012.

Intelligence-linked individuals complicate story

Farina’s claim is not centred solely on the reuse of a corporate name. He draws attention to people allegedly involved with both Ripple Communications and US intelligence bodies.

Karen Nussle, for example, worked for Ripple Communications and was also listed as a contact at INSA. Suzanne Wilson Heckenberg’s link to both organisations further complicates the narrative.

While working at Ripple Communications, she was actively involved with INSA, and her exit coincided with Ripple Labs’ emergence as a blockchain firm.

The overlapping timelines and reuse of Ripple trademarks give weight to the possibility that Ripple Labs may not be a brand new startup that began with decentralised ideals, but a repurposed corporate structure with a different origin.

Ryan Fugger’s exit and the missing links

Ryan Fugger, who launched RipplePay in the early 2000s, is central to the story. He initially led the vision of peer-to-peer financial exchange but eventually stepped aside when OpenCoin—later Ripple Labs—took over the project.

Farina’s theory questions why Fugger withdrew from the public eye just as Ripple gained momentum and whether this transition was as straightforward as it appeared.

The timeline suggests a handover of not only the project but also intellectual property tied to the Ripple name—dating back to the 1991 telecom firm.

Despite no official statements linking Ripple Labs to US intelligence agencies, the lack of clarity surrounding the trademark history, domain ownership, and staff affiliations keeps speculation alive.

The case remains unresolved

Ripple has never publicly commented on the theory, and no official documents tie the company to US intelligence bodies.

However, the presence of overlapping IPs, synchronised domain registrations, and telecom-era trademarks raises lingering questions.

The theory remains speculative but underscores the demand for transparency in crypto’s origin stories—particularly for companies now managing billions in digital assets.

Farina’s post has reignited debate across social platforms, with users pointing to archived WHOIS data and company records to try and piece together Ripple’s early days.

As Ripple continues to grow in prominence, especially amid its legal battles and stablecoin plans, the call for clarity around its beginnings will likely persist.

The post Ripple’s 1991 trademark trail, domain clues, US intelligence links spark intrigue appeared first on Invezz

Share
Related Articles

Which coin will deliver better returns this cycle, SOL or Ruvi AI’s audited token?

Cryptocurrency investors are always on the lookout for opportunities that promise significant...

Top 3 coins for 20x returns by year-end, SHIB did it—can MUTM be next?

Shiba Inu (SHIB) and Dogecoin (DOGE) turned everyday investors into overnight millionaires,...

What to buy before July ends: LINK is booming, but this crypto is catching fire

While Chainlink (LINK) is gaining serious attention again in the DeFi world,...

Crypto dips after Fed Powell remain mute on rate cuts, but this altcoin remains strong

Bitcoin is tumbling below $106,000, shaking confidence across the crypto market. Federal...